Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04655
Original file (BC 2013 04655.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
	RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 


IN THE MATTER OF:            DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04655 
		             COUNSEL: NONE
                             HEARING DESIRED: NO 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT

1.  His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or 
Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service inVietnam, specifically, 
boots-on-the-ground in Vietnam. 

2.  His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal 
(VSM) and the Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM). 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
 
The Air Force simply failed to put the VSM and VCM on his DD Form 214.
 
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his DDForm 214 and his
AF Form 7, Airman Military Record.
 
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

STATEMENT OF FACTS:
 
The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force whoserved on active duty 
from 7 January 1966 to 28 May 1969. His DD Form 214 reflects he served 3 years, 4 
months, and 21 days onactive duty with 8 months and 28 days of Foreign Service. His 
DD Form 7 reflects he was on temporary duty (TDY) to Southeast Asia(SEA) from 28 March
 1968 to 23 April 1968 and 11 July 1968 to26 July 1968.
 
The remaining relevant facts are contained in the evaluationsprovided by the Air Force 
offices of primary responsibility atExhibits C and D. 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
 
AFPC/DPAPP recommends denying the applicant’s request to correcthis record to show 
boots-on-the-ground in Vietnam. DPAPP states that after a review of his master 
personnel records and submitteddocumentation, they were unable to find any documentation 
to substantiate  his Foreign Service time was in Vietnam. 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

AFPC/DPSID recommends denying the applicant’s request for the VSMand VCM. DPSID states 
they were unable to locate officialdocumentation showing the applicant was in the area 
of eligibility for award of the VSM and the VCM. Sometimes the term “SEA” was used for 
duty in Taiwan and the Philippines which arenot in the area of eligibility for the VSM 
and VCM. Even if the applicant was in the area of eligibility, he does not meet the 30 
consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days in the area of eligibility. To grant relief would
be contrary to the eligibility criteria established by DoDM 1348.33. 

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
 
The applicant’s Congressional Liaison contacted the AF/HO,Director of the Air Force 
Historical Support Division, to verifyhis service in Vietnam. AF/HO indicated that 
according to theirresearch, the applicant’s unit deployed TDY to Cam Ranh Bay, Republic 
of Vietnam during 1968. While there is no unit roster with names, the unit was deployed 
completely, as the terms in thehistory demonstrate. 

The AF/HO email, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to 
excuse the failure to timely file. 

3. Insufficient evidence has been presented to demonstrate anerror or injustice with regard
to the VSM and VCM. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion andrecommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibilitythat even if the applicant was in the area of eligibility,
he does not meet the 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days inthe area of eligibility. 
Therefore, we find no basis to favorably consider this portion of the application. 

4. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate an error or injustice
in regard to the applicant’sservice in the Republic of Vietnam. Based on the AF/HO findings
indicating the applicant’s whole unit deployed to Vietnam in1968, we find the evidence 
sufficient to resolve this matter inthe applicant’s favor. Therefore, we recommend his 
records be corrected as indicated below. 


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
 
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Forcerelating to APPLICANT be 
corrected to show that he served “boots­on-the-ground” in the Republic of Vietnam in 1968. 
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04655 in 
Executive Session on 22 May 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
 
		, Panel Chair
		, Member
		, Member 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following documentary evidence 
for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013­04655 was considered:
 
	Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Sep 13, w/atchs.
	
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 19 Nov 13.
	
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 2 Jan 14.
	
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Mar 14.

	Exhibit F. Email, AF/HO, dated 2 May 14, w/atchs. 


     


						Panel Chair 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01393

    Original file (BC 2014 01393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no official documentation in the applicant’s records to verify he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of 6 months for award of the VCM. In additional, the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments verified the applicant as having served at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, but they were unable to confirm any foreign-service in Vietnam; therefore, rendering him ineligible for award of the VCM. To be eligible, a service member must be: permanently assigned,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04259

    Original file (BC 2013 04259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSID is unable to determine the dates and locations for the applicant's TDY to Vietnam; therefore, the applicant is ineligible for award of the AFEM, VSM, or the VCM during the award inclusive periods. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2013- 04259 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05271

    Original file (BC 2013 05271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request to correct his records to reflect service in Thailand.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01007

    Original file (BC-2013-01007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The VSM, VCM, and his service time in the Republic of Vietnam are not reflected in his records. The amount of Foreign Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 is correct, therefore, a correction is not needed. The Board notes the Air Force office of primary responsibility confirms the applicant was TDY to the Republic of Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 03206

    Original file (BC 2010 03206.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and Thailand. The VSM is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 1965 and 28 Mar 1973, in the area of eligibility. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2010- 03206 in Executive Session on 14 Feb 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01227

    Original file (BC 2014 01227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing his official military record and documentation he provided, DPAPP was able to verify and confirm boots on ground foreign service time in the Republic of Vietnam and Thailand for a total of 127 days between November 1966 and Mar 1968. In addition, the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC), Directorate of Assignments could only verify the applicant as having served in Vietnam and Thailand for a total of 127 days; therefore, rendering him ineligible for award of the VCM. Upon...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00548

    Original file (BC 2013 00548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the VCM. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2013-00548 in Executive Session on 29 Oct 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jan...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01446

    Original file (BC 2014 01446.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01446 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect the award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM) and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03553

    Original file (BC 2013 03553 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSID states that the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments was unable to verify the applicant's Foreign Service time in Vietnam. Moreover, the applicant’s TDY orders and the Foreign and/or Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 match up perfectly. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02237

    Original file (BC 2013 02237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, the applicant provides a detailed account of his temporary duty at Tan Son Nhut AB, Vietnam, in 1972 with supporting documentation showing he was issued an M-16. With respect to a comment in the DPAPP advisory opinion that the information provided by the applicant “did not contain information that reflects [the applicant] served in Vietnam,” that documentation does contain evidence that the applicant served in Vietnam: his detailed statement attached to his application. We...